Home Legal History • Download A Guide to Oral History and the Law by John A. Neuenschwander PDF

Download A Guide to Oral History and the Law by John A. Neuenschwander PDF

By John A. Neuenschwander

A advisor to Oral historical past and the legislation is the definitive source for all practitioners of oral background. In transparent, obtainable language it completely explains the entire severe felony concerns, together with felony liberate agreements; copyright; privateness; screening, enhancing, and sealing systems to guard opposed to defamation; the safety of sealed and nameless interviews from court docket disclosure; the function of Institutional assessment forums (IRBs); educating concerns; and the recent concerns raised via interviews on the net. Neuenschwander's imperative concentration is prevention, instead of litigation, and he cites not just the newest complaints but in addition examples of systems and regulations that oral historical past courses have used successfully to prevent felony problems. The e-book offers greater than a dozen pattern felony liberate agreements acceptable to quite a few occasions. This crucial quantity could be utilized by pros, family members historians, and scholars alike.

Show description

Read Online or Download A Guide to Oral History and the Law PDF

Similar legal history books

Landmark Congressional Laws on Education (Student's Guide to Landmark Congressional Laws)

Have you ever thought of the effect of a few of an important federal schooling laws--the G. I. invoice of Rights, university personal loan courses, investment of black schools, tuition lunch courses, construction of Head begin, precise teaching programs, bilingual schooling, and equivalent investment for ladies' athletics? This particular reference paintings presents a proof and dialogue of every landmark legislation via the particular textual content of key passages of the legislation.

Punishment and Political Order (Law, Meaning, and Violence)

So much folks contemplate punishment as an unsightly reveal of energy. yet punishment additionally tells us anything concerning the beliefs and aspirations of a humans and their executive. How a country punishes finds even if it truly is convinced in its personal legitimacy and sovereignty. Punishment and Political Order examines the questions raised by means of the state’s workout of punitive power—from what it really is approximately human psychology that wishes sanction and order to how the kingdom can administer ache whereas calling for justice.

The betrayal : the Nuremberg trials and German divergence

Examines how the Allies got here to phrases with how a 'civilised' state like Germany may perhaps perpetrate the crimes of WWII and sought to deliver them again to the Western fold. Priemel exhibits that whereas many German associations, that have been ostensibly just like their Allied opposite numbers, were corrupted even prior to Hitler's upward push to strength summary: Examines how the Allies got here to phrases with how a 'civilised' state like Germany may well perpetrate the crimes of WWII and sought to convey them again to the Western fold.

Extra info for A Guide to Oral History and the Law

Example text

An Arson Investigation The next case also involved a criminal prosecution, but in this instance the materials sought for discovery were not sealed or restricted interviews but the research notes of a graduate student. ” He conducted a substantial part of his research by working as a waiter at several Long Island restaurants. In addition to using direct observation, he also interviewed a number of his coworkers. Although he did not tape record them, he did keep detailed field notes of their comments and observations.

In the end the Supreme Court chose not to hear the case and the stay was lifted. The last part of the extended litigation was Boston College’s challenge C ompelled R elease of I nterviews | 2 7 to the federal district court’s decision following its in camera review of the interviews to order the release of eighty-five interviews. This appeal was also heard by the First Circuit. Foremost among the arguments raised by Boston College was the claim that despite its earlier ruling the court should allow for a limited researcher’s privilege because of the unique facts of this case.

Although the legal landscape may look very bleak when it comes to successfully defending against a subpoena for restricted interviews, it should be readily apparent that the Boston College case arose out of a very unique fact pattern ranging from the extensive self-publicity about the Belfast Project that initially prompted the subpoenas to the bitter feud that emerged between the researchers and college administrators. Thus, while one might be tempted to sharply curtail the practice of sealing or restricting access to interviews, this would be an overreaction.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.96 of 5 – based on 15 votes